The A-12 Avenger II: The Navy's Flying Dorito Stealth Bomber That Consumed $5 Billion, Never Flew, and Left a 30-Year Gap in Carrier-Based Strike Aviation

2026-07-21

In January 1988, the U.S. Navy awarded General Dynamics and McDonnell Douglas a fixed-price contract to build the A-12 Avenger II, a carrier-based stealth attack aircraft meant to replace the A-6 Intruder. It was a flying wing shaped like a perfect isoceles triangle — pilots called it "the Flying Dorito." Three years later, on January 7, 1991, Defense Secretary Dick Cheney cancelled it for default in what remains the largest weapons program termination in Pentagon history. The Navy has never replaced the strike capability it lost.

The design. A pure flying wing, 70.25 ft wingspan folding to 36.3 ft for carrier stowage, two General Electric F412-GE-D5F2 non-afterburning turbofans buried in the airframe, internal weapons bay carrying 5,160 lb of ordnance including two AIM-120 AMRAAMs, and a projected combat radius of 800 nautical miles — nearly double the F/A-18C. Top speed Mach 0.9. Radar cross-section targets were classified but reportedly comparable to the F-117. Two crew, side-by-side. It would have been the first tactical stealth aircraft designed from day one to operate off a pitching deck.

Why it collapsed. Three failures compounded:

General Dynamics and McDonnell Douglas sued the government for wrongful termination. The case dragged on for 23 years. In 2014 it was finally settled with Boeing (which had absorbed McDonnell Douglas) and General Dynamics paying the government $400 million in aircraft and services. The Navy got nothing that flew.

Why it could work now. Every technical problem that killed the A-12 has been solved:

The Navy's F/A-XX program, expected to fly in the 2030s, is essentially a second attempt at the A-12's mission. Boeing and Northrop Grumman are competing. Both proposals reportedly feature a tailless flying-wing planform with an internal bay and an ~800 nm radius. The Dorito is coming back — 40 years late and after a $5 billion tuition payment.

Key Takeaway: The A-12 wasn't a bad aircraft — it was a good aircraft built with 1988 composite tooling under a fixed-price contract that punished honesty, and every technical obstacle that killed it has been solved by the aircraft the Navy is now paying to design from scratch.

All newsletters