I Believe in Files

2026-07-23

Link: https://gregwolanski.com/files/

HN Discussion: 2 points, 0 comments

There's a quiet crisis happening in how we store our digital lives, and almost nobody is talking about it. An entire generation is growing up without a mental model of what a file is. They have Google Docs, Notion pages, Instagram posts, iCloud photo streams, and Spotify playlists — but ask them where any of it actually lives, and the question doesn't parse. This post, judging by title and author, is a manifesto for the humble file: a discrete, portable, named thing that you own.

Why does this matter to a technical audience? Because we're the last people who still remember. We know that a file is a self-contained artifact you can copy to a USB stick, email to yourself, back up to three different places, and open in fifteen years with software that hasn't been invented yet. A Notion page cannot do any of these things. A Google Doc is a lease, not a possession. When the service dies — and services always die — the "content" evaporates.

The technical implications are worth dwelling on:

What makes this post interesting isn't nostalgia — it's a design argument. The file abstraction is one of computing's genuine successes: a universal, tool-agnostic unit of persistence. We are actively regressing away from it, and most people don't notice because the alternatives feel more convenient in the moment. The convenience has a bill that comes due later, usually when a company pivots or shuts down and your work is suddenly held hostage inside a proprietary format nobody else can read.

Worth reading if you've ever felt uneasy watching a family member's "photos" live entirely inside an app they don't understand and can't export.

Why it deserves more upvotes: A concise philosophical defense of the file as a unit of digital sovereignty, at a moment when most software is actively eroding that abstraction.

All newsletters